Tag: Universal Pictures

  • Review: Nosferatu

    Review: Nosferatu

    When F.W. Murnau’s Nosferatu premiered in 1922, Bram Stoker had only been dead for a decade, and Hollywood was still nearly ten years away from its own adaptation of Dracula. Each version honoured the horror of Stoker’s novel in distinct ways, spawning a century of imitators. Even single chapters, like the voyage of the Demeter, got their own film. Now, over 100 years later, Robert Eggers draws on this rich visual tradition to craft something uniquely his own, paying homage to the past while forging unique ground in the vampire mythos.

    If you’ve encountered any version of this tale, the broad strokes will feel familiar. It’s Germany, 1838, and newlywed Thomas Hutter (Nicholas Hoult), ignoring the emphatic warnings of his wife Ellen (Lily-Rose Depp), is sent by his firm to Transylvania to personally seal a deal with the mysterious Count Orlok (Bill Skarsgård). Cue the nightmares.

    As Hutter wrestles with both literal and figurative demons in his bid for freedom, Ellen is overcome by prophetic visions and bouts of somnambulism that link her to Orlok. Her friends Anna (Emma Corrin) and Friedrich Harding (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) reluctantly enlist the help of Professor Albin Eberhart Von Franz (Willem Dafoe), a scientist with a fixation on the occult. Meanwhile, their German town is ravaged by plague as Orlok and Ellen find themselves inescapably drawn together by the force of fate.

    Nosferatu (2024)

    So, while the shopfront is the same–and it’s an almost aggressively traditional retelling of the tale at that–Eggers has unquestionably put his unique stylistic stamp all over this. From the moment Orlock’s gravelling, bass-infused voice comes booming through the bottom end of the sound system. This is Gothic with a capital G, with the aesthetics of the silent era filtered through a myriad of touchpoints from across the ages.

    The German Expressionism of Murnau is present in the black and white tones that seamlessly give way to colour splashes. It’s there as Orlok’s shadow fingers stretch across a patchwork city and in the stairs and angles that mirror the 1922 designs of artist Albin Grau. Like that film and Francis Ford Coppola’s Bram Stoker’s Dracula, occultism and satanic symbolism is present at every turn. Combined with the low, unsettling rumble of the sound design and Robin Carolan’s haunting score, Eggers conjures a visceral terror akin to what audiences must have felt a century ago.

    If NOSFERATU stumbles, it’s in its treatment of its female characters. Ellen and Anna—or Mina and Lucy, for the traditionalists—are confined to roles that remain disappointingly defined by the original text. Decades of reinterpretations, from Herzog to Coppola, have largely followed the same patterns, and Eggers’ script does little to disrupt them. Whether they’re depicted as naked riders or sexualised bait, the women serve more as pawns in a male-dominated narrative than as agents of their own destinies.

    That said, this doesn’t diminish Depp’s performance one iota. Even within the constraints of the role, she commands attention with a magnetic presence. Dafoe, by now a fixture in Eggers’ eccentric gallery of players, brings both gravitas and surprising levity, delivering even the most outlandish lines with an earnestness that makes them work. Taylor-Johnson, however, feels slightly out of place, as though a contemporary action hero has wandered into Eggers’ meticulously crafted Gothic past.

    As the film races toward its dawn conclusion, the grotesqueries of raw vampiric shapes are thrust into the light of day, exposing their absurdity as much as their terror. This duality—both reactions seemingly intended—is a fitting finale. The ending doesn’t tease a Son of Nosferatu or hint at hands clawing out of graves in mid-credits. Instead, the story closes its loop, cementing Gothic horror firmly back at the top of the cinematic mantle where it belongs.

    2024 | USA | DIRECTOR: Robert Eggers | WRITERS: Robert Eggers (Based on Nosferatu by Henrik Galeen) | CAST: Bill Skarsgård, Nicholas Hoult, Lily-Rose Depp, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Emma Corrin, Willem Dafoe | DISTRIBUTOR: Universal Pictures (Australia), Focus Features (USA) | RUNNING TIME: 132 minutes | RELEASE DATE: 1 January 2025 (Australia), 25 December 2024 (USA)

  • Review: The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim

    Review: The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim

    Animation has long been drawn to J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle-earth. As early as the late 1930s, Walt Disney toyed with the idea of adapting The Hobbit, while Rankin/Bass and Ralph Bakshi took on the challenge in the 1970s and 80s with varying degrees of success.

    Kenji Kamiyama’s THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE WAR OF THE ROHIRRIM, however, feels like a bridge between eras. It draws as much from the visual language of Peter Jackson’s six live-action adaptations and the rich tradition of Japanese cinema and anime as it does from its animated predecessors. It also doesn’t hurt that Miranda Otto returns to narrate the film as the character of Éowyn.

    Set 180 years before the events of The Lord of the Rings, this animated tale shifts its focus to Hera (Gaia Wise), the daughter of Helm Hammerhand (voiced by Brian Cox), the King of Rohan. When tragedy strikes following Wulf’s (Luke Pasqualino) failed proposal to Hera, the son of Freca launches an invasion of Rohan.

    The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim

    In response, Hera and Helm lead their people to seek refuge at the Hornburg, where they hold out against the Dunlendings. This legendary stronghold, etched into the history of Middle-earth, will eventually come to be known as Helm’s Deep. 

    Drawing primarily from Appendix A of The Lord of the Rings (and with some inspiration from Unfinished Tales), Kamiyama and the writing team face the challenge of fleshing out a largely skeletal narrative. However, the film cleverly sidesteps this with Éowyn’s opening narration: “Do not look for tales of her in the old songs. There are none.” This gives the filmmakers room to expand on the legend, carving out a space for originality within the established mythology.

    Hera proves to be a compelling protagonist, her strength and determination anchoring the story, while Wulf embodies a straightforward, single-minded villainy. Yet, for a narrative reaching well over two hours, some of the material feels (as Bilbo might put it) stretched a little thin. Tolkien’s legendarium often thrives on cycles and repetition—like the echoes of Beren and Lúthien in Arwen and Aragorn—and while this story is canonically rooted in the Appendices, it’s hard not to notice parallels to the motifs of the Battle of Helm’s Deep in Jackson’s films.

    Visually, THE WAR OF THE ROHIRRIM is a feast. Frame by frame, the film captures the grandeur of Middle-earth, with the iconic Aotearoa New Zealand locations lovingly recreated alongside familiar settings like Edoras and Isengard. However, it’s in Kamiyama’s bolder departures that the animation truly shines—most notably in a gobsmacking sequence featuring an eldritch Watcher in the Water devouring an oliphaunt whole, a scene that brims with imagination and menace.

    Some of this was achieved through an innovative blend of motion capture, translated into a gaming engine to determine 3D environments, and then recreated in 2D to get a more authentic fluidity to the movement. While this technique elevates the gloriously staged battle sequences, it occasionally falters, with some character movements feeling stiff and reminiscent of puppetry.

    THE WAR OF THE ROHIRRIM may not resonate with the same impact as the films and books from which it draws inspiration. At times, its repeated nods to the new tenant of Isengard, wizards and Mordor’s search for rings leave it tethered to its role as a prequel rather than standing firmly as a standalone tale. Yet, this is a direction I’d wholeheartedly encourage for the franchise—a foray into stories rich with potential that don’t demand a sprawling trilogy to unfold. Kamiyama’s film isn’t without flaws, but its ambition and approach make me eager to see more in this vein.

    2024 | USA, Japan | DIRECTOR: Kenji Kamiyama | WRITERS: Jeffrey Addiss, Will Matthews, Phoebe Gittins, Arty Papageorgiou | STORY: Jeffrey Addiss, Will Matthews, Philippa Boyens (Based on characters created by J. R. R. Tolkien) | CAST: Brian Cox, Gaia Wise, Luke Pasqualino, Miranda Otto | DISTRIBUTOR: Warner Bros. Pictures (USA), Universal Pictures (Australia) | RUNNING TIME: 134 minutes | RELEASE DATE: 12 December 2024 (Australia), 13 December 2024 (USA)

  • Review: Wicked

    Review: Wicked

    For musical theatre fans, the original Broadway production of Wicked holds a special place in many hearts. Based on Gregory Maguire’s novel and riffing on L. Frank Baum’s Oz stories, the musical is one of the few to break the billion-dollar mark in Broadway revenue and has been performed worldwide in multiple languages.

    This brings us to the biggest challenge for film adaptations of stage musicals: while countless live performances and cast variations ensure no two shows are ever exactly alike, a film locks us into a single interpretation. In adapting Wicked for the screen, director Jon M. Chu and screenwriters Winnie Holzman and Dana Fox have added an extra hurdle for audiences by dividing the story into two separate films, disrupting the natural flow of a two-act musical.

    This first chapter of WICKED (or Wicked: Chapter 1, as it’s ornately titled on screen) quickly distinguishes itself from Stephen Schwartz and Holzman’s stage version, opening with a lavish display of CGI monkeys and sweeping digital landscapes. We see the Ozians celebrating the recent death of the Wicked Witch of the West, slain by a young girl from Kansas.

    Wicked (2024)

    However, Galinda (Ariana Grande), who will later become Glinda the Good Witch of the North, tells a tale that might change the celebrants’ minds. She and the green-skinned Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) first crossed paths while studying at Shiz University. Elphaba’s skin colour and uncontrolled powers initially set the two at odds, but they become friends against a backdrop of growing prejudice. As talking animals in Oz are mysteriously driven out of cities, the only person who might help is the Wizard (Jeff Goldblum).

    By expanding the characters and backstories—drawing partly from Maguire’s novel—it’s clear why the decision was made to split the story into two parts. There’s so much exposition that, while it works in the shorthand of the stage, doesn’t always translate to the more visually oriented medium of film. Even so, at 160 minutes, WICKED takes as long to tell one act of the story as the entire original stage production.

    Director Chu and the creative team use that time to paint the screen with extravagant production numbers and ornate costumes. “The Wizard and I,” for example, starts with Elphaba running around Shiz grounds and ends atop a digital clifftop. Another number takes place amid a vast set of rotating cogs filled with books. Conversely, a scene set in a nightclub, featuring animal bands and surreal objects, teeters on the edge of Cats territory.

    What anchors it all are the lead performances. Erivo’s Broadway background brings gravitas to Elphaba, with vocals powerful enough to reach the back of the theatre next door. Grande’s comic timing—recently showcased on SNL—and impressive high notes make her an ideal Galinda/Glinda. Supporting players Michelle Yeoh and Jeff Goldblum are a welcome addition, though the latter’s Rex Harrison-esque talk-singing is curtailed by shortened songs.

    The climactic “Defying Gravity” ends WICKED on a literal high note, blending action sequences with one of musical theatre’s most iconic modern duets. Still, as we brace ourselves for a lengthy interval before Act 2, maintaining this momentum may prove challenging. At least this extended intermission offers ample time for a snack and a loo break.

    2024 | USA | DIRECTOR: John M. Chu | WRITERS: Winnie Holzman, Dana Fox (Based on the musical by Stephen Schwartz and Winnie Holzman and the novel by Gregory Maguire) | CAST: Cynthia Erivo, Ariana Grande, Jonathan Bailey, Ethan Slater, Bowen Yang, Marissa Bode, Peter Dinklage, Michelle Yeoh, Jeff Goldblum | DISTRIBUTOR: Universal Pictures | RUNNING TIME: 160 minutes | RELEASE DATE: 21 November 2024 (Australia), 22 November 2024 (USA)

  • Review: Joker: Folie à Deux

    Review: Joker: Folie à Deux

    Stop me if you’ve heard this one. A clown and his obsessive love walk into a toxic pit. Manipulation. Cruelty. Exploitation. Fans eat it up, blind to the abuse. They call it love. Good joke. Everybody laugh. Roll snare. Curtains.

    Todd Phillips’ award-winning Joker walked a dangerous line. While technically impressive and anchored by Joaquin Phoenix’s powerful performance as Arthur Fleck, the film’s portrayal of women as mere objects or barriers, coupled with its muddled political stance and exploration of mental health, left it morally ambiguous and unsettling in today’s post-#MeToo landscape.

    Now, in the sequel, we get a brief glimmer of hope that the film will address those consequences. Imprisoned after his public execution of a celebrity on live TV, Fleck is a hollow version of himself, sedated by a mix of drugs and the cruelty of an abusive guard (Brendan Gleeson).

    Joker: Folie à Deux (2024)

    When he meets Lee (Lady Gaga) in a group singing therapy class, they instantly connect. Lee “gets” him, and in a typical male fantasy, she doesn’t believe he needs to change. Thus begins a romance, blending magic musical realism and impotent sexual encounters.

    As with the first film, we quickly learn not to trust what we see. Fleck/Joker frequently slips into elaborate song-filled fantasy mid-sentence, though Phillips and co-writer Scott Silver never fully commit to this device. Lee is portrayed as both fanatical and duplicitous, reinforcing the misogyny from the first film. I’m starting to wonder if that misogyny is in front of the camera or behind it.

    The film’s highlight is Fleck’s highly publicised murder trial—a classic stage for dramatic revelations. Here we get to the core of the film, albeit through a disjointed mix of commentary on media, personality cults, the prison system, and maybe even reality TV. Phoenix excels in these moments, especially during his ‘small town lawyer’ routine in full makeup, sharing a heartbreaking exchange with Gary (Leigh Gill). But it’s also where the cracks show, revealing that the musical element is more afterthought than centrepiece.

    Joker: Folie à Deux (2024)

    It’s all incredibly frustrating, as there are moments of brilliance in there. With its nods to Warner animation, classical musicals and strong central cast, it looks like a winning formula on paper. Phoenix, for his part, still works wonders with the material, though there’s a sense that both he and the character are weary of Joker. Gaga, meanwhile, is stuck in a limiting role, but her costumes will no doubt be the ships that launch a thousand cosplays.

    Taken at face value, for very little lurks beneath the surface of this set of first-draft ideas, JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX is either a skewering of toxic fandom at best, or a middle finger to the fans themselves at worst. The latter tracks with Phillips’s clear disdain for the source material, even if the little Easter eggs and references continue to try chew their cake and spit them out too.

    As with the original Joker, the final laugh comes in an explosive finale that subverts expectations as much as it embraces them. In the film, Fleck defies his followers and pays the price and is literally chased down by his own creations. In reality, we see this dynamic in fandom and politics. What’s unclear is whether the monster was right all along or if it’s all just a cosmic joke. That’s all, folks.

    2024 | USA | DIRECTOR: Todd Phillips | WRITERS: Scott Silver, Todd Phillips | CAST: Joaquin Phoenix, Lady Gaga, Brendan Gleeson, Catherine Keener | DISTRIBUTOR: Warner Bros. (US), Universal Pictures (Australia) | RUNNING TIME: 138 minutes | RELEASE DATE: 3 October 2024 (Australia), 4 October 2024 (USA)

  • Review: Twisters

    Review: Twisters

    The only thing more surprising than a standalone sequel to Jan de Bont’s 1996 Twister is its director. Lee Isaac Chung, fresh off his sweeping, character-driven Minari, takes the helm. Set again in Oklahoma, this throwback disaster flick combines survival against the odds with a sense of comforting familiarity, all painted on a much bigger canvas.

    Idealistic storm chaser Kate Cooper (Daisy Edgar-Jones) and her technically minded friend Javi (Anthony Ramos) lose their friends to a tornado while pursuing a storm-killer solution. Years later, the now-successful Javi lures Kate back into storm chasing with the promise of data to prevent future tragedies. Battling her PTSD and reckless social media star Tyler Owens (Glen Powell), they find themselves in a once-in-a-generation storm season.

    Mark L. Smith’s narrative relies on a lot of coincidence. Disaster must strike randomly and repeatedly in a compact space in order for the story to progress in any way. While the technology has moved on, and there is a recognition that there probably would be a YouTube channel for all of this, Smith and Chung also know not to mess with a tried and true formula. In fact, were it not for the modern trappings and effects, this could have happily been released in the heyday of big disaster movies — and there’s not a thing wrong with that.

    Twisters (2024)

    It’s also still a character piece at the heart of the film, even if those figures are fairly lightly drawn. Kate is fine successor to Helen Hunt’s Jo in the original, not only following a similar path of tragedy to redemption but giving us a human hook to hang a hurricane on. The two male leads are less well rounded, although it’s eventual love interest Powell who has this arc from over-the-top redneck to studied saviour. That said, Ramos is often relegated to a supporting character, and American Honey‘s Sasha Lane is criminally underused.

    Yet if you’re turning up for a film called TWISTERS, you are here for the titular tornadoes. The location settings are convincingly ripped apart by the literal sturm und drang of the devastating phenomenon. There’s a wonderful union of special effects and Dan Mindel’s cinematography. In the climactic moment, there’s a beautiful shot that literally rips the screen off a cinema, creating one of the more beautiful effects I’ve seen in a blockbuster.

    Chung’s film is ultimately everything a ‘sequel’ should be. In fact, save for a few nominal nods to the nomenclature of the original, TWISTERS happily stands on its own as an event. If the storms are going to be this fun, we’ll happily keep chasing them.

    2024 | USA | DIRECTOR: Lee Isaac Chung | WRITERS: Mark L. Smith | CAST: Daisy Edgar-Jones, Glen Powell, Anthony Ramos | DISTRIBUTOR: Universal Pictures (USA), Warner Bros. (Australia) | RUNNING TIME: 132 minutes | RELEASE DATE: 11 July 2024 (Australia), 19 July 2024 (USA)

  • Review: The Bikeriders

    Review: The Bikeriders

    Consciously name-checking The Wild One and Easy Rider along the way, Jeff Nichols’ sixth feature harks back to a period of great change across the United States. Based on the 1967 photo-book of the same name by photographer and filmmaker Danny Lyon, it’s not quite as documentary but there is a sense of authenticity in the low rumble of its engines.

    Framed as a recollection by Kathy (Jodie Comer), the wife of biker Benny (Austin Butler), the film examines the rise of the fictional Vandals outlaw motorcycle club in Chicago during the 1960s. After meeting Benny in a bar, she’s drawn into a world run under the honour code of leader Johnny (Tom Hardy).

    Over the better part of a decade, we follow the violent rise and fall of the gang, who are loosely modelled on the Outlaws showcased in Lyon’s original book. Kind of like Goodfellas, the audience rapidly gets pulled into the normalcy of this life. Kathy is initially overwhelmed by the appeal of the outlandish rebels, but soon we think nothing of the boozy picnics that threaten to erupt into fisticuffs at the drop of a beer bottle. 

    The Bikeriders

    There are violent peaks and emotional troughs, but Nichols stills gives enough space to explore some of the smaller characters along the way. There’s an extended sequence dedicated to The Walking Dead’s Norman Reedus that’s quite amusing, and a seemingly unrelated subplot about a group of wannabes that comes swinging back with a vengeance later in the film.

    Comer is magnificent, both narrator and charismatic lightning rod for the film. I would not be surprised if she turns up in a list of ‘best ofs’ at the other end of this year. Hardy does that one accent he does, but he’s damn good – it’s like he absorbs all the light around him on screen. Butler’s performance is great as well, although it’s far more obvious. Michael Shannon is terrific as always and I would happily watch a spin-off series just following Zipco telling stories.

    When Easy Rider hit the cinemas, it was at the birth of a New Hollywood, one that rejected the bloat of the dominant paradigm. THE BIKERIDERS isn’t quite so revolutionary, being more of a product of that system than a rejection of it, and nor is it meant to be. Yet what it does well is showcase its stars and allow them to shine.

    SFF 2023

    2023 | USA | DIRECTOR: Jeff Nichols | WRITER: Jeff Nichols | CAST: Jodie Comer Austin Butler Tom Hardy Michael Shannon Mike Faist Norman Reedus | DISTRIBUTOR: Sydney Film Festival 2024, Universal Pictures | RUNNING TIME: 116 minutes | RELEASE DATE: 5-16 June 2024 (SFF 2024), 21 June 2024 (USA), 4 July (Australia)

  • Review: Furiosa – A Mad Max Saga

    Review: Furiosa – A Mad Max Saga

    When Mad Max: Fury Road came roaring back onto screens in 2015, it reminded us of two very important things. First and foremost, George Miller’s power as a visual storyteller was accelerating. That, and Australia has long been the perfect backdrop for a post-apocalyptic hellscape. 

    Watching FURIOSA: A MAD MAX SAGA at the premiere in early May at the magnificent State Theatre in Sydney, that local connection was tangible. From the presence of the cast and crew, including Chris Hemsworth in his first local film to date, through to cheers as familiar names and faces appeared on screen, it was a screening that arguably disproved the tall poppy syndrome we in the Antipodes wear like a badge of honour. Shot in the NSW towns of Hay and Silverton, it’s been almost four decades since Mad Max has felt quite this home grown.

    Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga

    Set several decades before the events of Fury Road, young Furiosa (Anya Taylor-Joy) is taken by a Biker Horde led by the Warlord Dementus (Hemsworth). Growing up in this harsh environment, she is soon embroiled at the centre of a war for a citadel run by Immortan Joe (Lachy Hulme). 

    The difficulty faced by all prequels is that we already know how it all turns out. Charlize Theron’s Furiosa arrived on screens as a fully-formed character, eclipsing even Tom Hardy’s tortured soul on screen. (Indeed, Miller and co-writer Nico Lathouris had extensively scripted Furiosa’s backstory for Theron to draw on). Yet this is George Miller and there’s very little chance that you won’t feel the burn of his pacing or go over old ground – even over the course of 148 minutes.

    Stylistically matching much of Miller’s previous series entry, the first shock comes with the sheer amount of green we see in the ‘place of abundance’ glimpsed in the opening act of this film. The rest of the movie is split into booklike chapters, running us up and down the Fury Road in, hanging off or crashing into a giant chrome-plated war machine. While arguably not quite as gobsmacking as it was almost a decade ago, it’s nevertheless filled with so many cataclysmically impressive set-pieces that it scarcely matters if any of it makes complete sense. 

    Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga

    Taylor-Joy slips into this world with seemingly effortless grace, allowing audiences to combine her performance with Theron’s in our head-canon.  Hemsworth is clearly having a ball playing a decidedly non-heroic type, almost as if the prosthetic nose he sports was all the excuse he needed to let his freak flag fly.

    In many ways, FURIOSA feels like an extended appendix to Fury Road, especially given that Miller ends this by leading us by the hand into the story’s ‘sequel.’ So, did we need this story? From a narrative perspective, perhaps not. Yet as fans of high-octane movies, we greedily accept this meaty specimen of action fun, especially in a cinematic landscape that occasionally feels as barren as a post-apocalyptic Australia.

    2024 | Australia, USA | DIRECTOR: George Miller | WRITERS: George Miller, Nico Lathouris | CAST: Anya Taylor-Joy, Chris Hemsworth, Tom Burke, Alyla Browne, Lachy Hulme | DISTRIBUTOR: Warner Bros. Pictures, Universal Pictures (Australia) | RUNNING TIME: 148 minutes | RELEASE DATE: 23 May 2024 (Australia), 24 May 2024 (USA)

  • Review: The Fall Guy

    Review: The Fall Guy

    From his uncredited co-directorial debut on John Wick through to Atomic Blonde, Deadpool 2, Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw and Bullet Train, director David Leitch has solidified his reputation of modern action. So, with THE FALL GUY, he and writer Drew Pearce aim to both deconstruct and poke fun at the whole enterprise – and have a ball doing so.

    In the film, Hollywood stunt performer Colt Seavers (Ryan Gosling) is doubling for megastar Tom Ryder (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) when a stunt goes horribly wrong. During Colt’s recovery, he blames himself for the accident and breaks off all contact with his girlfriend Jody (Emily Blunt), a camera operator.

    Over a year and a half later, Colt is surprised to find himself summoned by Ryder’s producer Gail Meyer (Hannah Waddingham) to Sydney, where Jody is making her directorial debut on a new sci-fi event picture starring Ryder. Against the backdrop of a fractious relationship between Jody and Cole, it transpires that Ryder has gone missing – and Gail wants Cole to track him down.

    The Fall Guy (2024)

    While loosely based on the 1980s TV series with Lee Majors, in which the lead was a kind of bounty hunter, this version of THE FALL GUY most reminds me of a Shane Black joint. It’s a self-referential parody of the film industry, led by an affably beleaguered Gosling, while also being a massive love letter to stunt performers. It’s not quite the Academy Award category they deserve – but it will do while we’re waiting.

    The action is impressive, especially when much of it takes place on the street where I regularly pop out to grab lunch or a bottle of fizzy water for afternoon tea. (It was the same feeling all Sydneysiders had back in 1999 with The Matrix, except we actually get on-screen credit this time). The latter culminates in the highly reported chase across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, one that shut down the iconic landmark for several hours. I wonder if they still had to pay the toll on the way back?

    Cinematographer Jonathan Sela captures all the obligatory postcard shots of Sydney, including the Opera House in both the film’s reality and Metalstorm, the film within a film. Speaking of which, the scenes we see from the faux film are impressively scaled, almost to the point that we’d actually like to see that film play out as well.

    Perhaps the only thing counting against Leitch’s film is that it ultimately paints itself into a corner with its own high concept. Even with the best intentions, being this self-aware often means relying on the familiar tropes it’s skewering. Despite the Antipodean setting, this is very much a Hollywood production — and at times it feels like it could have been made anywhere at any time in the last forty years. If you don’t see the ultimate villain and resolution coming, you probably need to see more movies. To quote Steve Martin in Grand Canyon, all of life’s riddles are answered in the movies.

    Nevertheless, from the Miami Vice-inspired chases across Sydney Harbour to the record making barrel rolls, it’s hard to describe THE FALL GUY as anything less than fun. As the credits roll over shots of the real-life stunt team who helped bring this to life, you’ll unquestionably have a deeper appreciation for the people who make the stars look good – and maybe that’s enough.

    2024 | USA | DIRECTOR: David Leitch | WRITERS: Drew Pearce | CAST: Ryan Gosling, Emily Blunt, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Hannah Waddingham, Teresa Palmer, Stephanie Hsu, Winston Duke | DISTRIBUTOR: Universal Pictures | RUNNING TIME: 126 minutes | RELEASE DATE: 26 April 2024 (Australia), 3 May 2024 (USA)

  • Review: Challengers

    Review: Challengers

    Luca Guadagnino’s most recent films have almost become a sub-genre unto themselves. At least since his adaptation of Call Me By Your Name (2017), he’s been looking at coming-of-age relationships through the lenses of newborn desire, cannibalism (Bones and All) and now, tennis.

    Well, we say tennis but from the moment that the pounding intensity of Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross’ score kicks in during a challenger match at New Rochester – a pounding electronic beat that’s in discord with the country club surroundings – it’s very obvious that the visuals are at odds with what lies beneath. This very much sets the tone for the film that’s to come.

    In Justin Kuritzkes’ screenplay, that match between fading tennis pro Art Donaldson (Mike Faist) and challenger Patrick Zweig (Josh O’Connor) — all while former player Tashi Duncan (Zendaya) watches on — serves as a jumping-off point for a series of nonlinear flashbacks. From their days on the junior circuit, including an encounter in a hotel room, through relationships and affairs, a triptych of overlapping narratives emerges. 

    Challengers (2024)

    In this way, CHALLENGERS presents itself as both a mystery and an erotically charged tale of a ménage that runs for over a decade. Having said that, there isn’t a single sex scene in the film. That’s all left on the court, with individual tennis matches charged with more tension than the most adrenaline fuelled blockbusters of the day. 

    So, what we’re left with is an engaging film about the complexities of love. In this sense, it’s Guadagnino’s most mature outing to date. Just when you think you have one of the characters all figured out, Kuritzkes and Guadagnino throw us another piece of the puzzle and suddenly a different idea snaps into place. 

    A lot of this is thanks to the singular performances from the cast, including O’Connor revelling in Zweig’s unearned swagger. Similarly, Zendaya arguably turning in her most accomplished performance since Sam Levinson’s Malcolm & Marie, another film that lays the inner workings of a relationship bare for the audience to see.

    It all culminates in what is perhaps the most intense forty minutes of cinema in recent memory. The challenger tennis match, one that has served as the glue for the interwoven narrative, all comes to a head in a series of strokes laden with additional meaning.

    CHALLENGERS leaves us with a literal embrace after a furious volley at the net. It’s a sweet release for both the audience and the players, a kind of Flashdance bucket that drenches us all in cool relief after a long build-up. As Guadagnino leaves us at this point, we must ponder what comes next – or happily go straight back in for an instant replay. 

    2024 | USA | DIRECTOR: Luca Guadagnino | WRITERS: Justin Kuritzkes | CAST: Zendaya, Josh O’Connor, Mike Faist | DISTRIBUTOR: Warner Bros. (International), Universal Pictures (Australia), Amazon MGM Studios (USA) | RUNNING TIME: 131 minutes | RELEASE DATE: 26 April 2024

  • Review: Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire

    Review: Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire

    It’s a pretty good time to be a Godzilla fan. The OG kaiju roared his way back into our lives last year with Takeshi Yamazaki’s magnificent Godzilla Minus One, becoming the first non-English-language film ever to win an Academy Award for Best Visual Effects. So, like Godzilla themselves hearing the growls of a titan across the world, Hollywood has responded to the call with mountains of excess.

    Chronologically following the events of Godzilla vs. Kong (2021), and the fifth film overall in the MonsterVerse franchise that began with Godzilla (2014), it begins with Godzilla happily chomping his way through rival titans on the surface while Kong continues to search for brethren in the subterranean realms of Hollow Earth. Yet when Dr. Ilene Andrews (Rebecca Hall) and her intuitive adoptive daughter Jia (Kaylee Hottle) detect strange signals from the underworld, a new threat looms large. The stage is set for a team-up, old foes becoming allies, families found and lots of monkey on lizard fighting.

    Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire

    In stark contrast to Minus One’s modest $15 million budget, GODZILLA X KONG: THE NEW EMPIRE comes in swinging with a reported $135 million price tag. Indeed, there’s no subtle obfuscation of monsters here: the audience is treated to a CG creature chase, a Godzilla/spider titan fight and a monkey with a toothache all in the first fifteen minutes. 

    Admittedly, there are times when it is difficult to tell what is going on. You might even get whiplash from the location changes. At other times, the arrival at a decision point is more plot convenience than logic driven. Indeed, the back half of the film presents a series of deus ex machina moments – from mechanical arms to creature cameos – that you simply have no choice but to roll with it.

    What’s missing here is the human storyline. Yes, we get some returning characters and watch them progress incrementally over the course of 115 minutes. Yet the best monster films acknowledge the trauma and loss of devastation. As we watch iconic monuments topple across the world with nary a flinch, we remember that these films were a post-War reaction to very real destruction across Japan. Now a crushed pyramid, or the cultural collage of various First Nations peoples, is simply more grist for the mill.

    Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire

    Here the human elements are merely there to prop up the titanic clashes, and on this level director Adam Wingard’s film mostly succeeds. The arrival of additional Kong creatures gives us effects on par with the Planet of the Apes reboot franchise. Godzilla absorbing a nuclear reactor is an iconic moment. Still, while we all know the industry-wide problems with CG and workplace practice, there are elements of the climactic Rio de Janeiro sequence that are significantly less convincing than anything in Minus One.

    Like Godzilla and Kong themselves, the Japanese and US franchises can happily exist in separate worlds for their respective audiences. GODZILLA X KONG wholesale scratches an itch for big budget brain candy, leaving the door wide open for more monster mayhem.

    2024 | USA | DIRECTOR: Adam Wingard | WRITERS: Terry Rossio, Simon Barrett, Jeremy Slater | CAST: Rebecca Hall, Brian Tyree Henry, Dan Stevens, Kaylee Hottle, Alex Ferns, Fala Chen | DISTRIBUTOR: Warner Bros. (Worldwide), Universal Pictures (Australia) | RUNNING TIME: 115 minutes | RELEASE DATE: 28 March 2023 (Australia), 29 March 2023 (USA)